The Office Action Response Workbook · Section 2(d)
Got a refusal that says your trademark is likely to be confused with another? This workbook walks you from the refusal letter to a finished response you file yourself, one worksheet at a time. No retainer, no hourly bill.
The workbook is everything in between.
What you'll actually do
Steps 1 to 4 take an evening. Steps 5 to 9 are where the real work happens. Tap any step to see its worksheet and its finish line.
Example values. The serial number is fictional.
Before you write a word
Step 4 checks three quick exits first. If one fits, it can end the refusal without a single page of argument.
When only some of your listed goods overlap with the cited mark's, deleting or limiting those items can remove the conflict.
If it's an earlier-filed application, not yet registered, the examiner usually suspends your application while it's decided.
If the owner missed a required maintenance filing and the grace period has passed, you point it out and ask the examiner to suspend.
None of them fit? Worksheet 2.4 records that, and Step 5 starts your argument.
Will it look professional?
The companion Word file is formatted for filing, with the legal standards already in place. Every highlighted [bracket] is a fact only you know.
A. Legal Standard. Likelihood of confusion is determined under the factors set out in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973). Not every factor is relevant in every case, and “a single duPont factor may . . . be dispositive.” Kellogg Co. v. Pack’em Enterprises, Inc., 951 F.2d 330, 333 (Fed. Cir. 1991).
C. The Goods Are Not Related. [ANALYSIS]
Example from the workbook. HARBORLIGHT and HARBOR LITE are invented marks.
How do I know what to argue?
The scorecard shows where your case is strong. Then each of the 50 authorities is worked through on an invented pair of marks, with recent Board reversals for support and a box for your notes.
| Factor | Favors me | Neutral | Favors examiner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Marks: appearance and sound | |||
| 2. Goods or services | |||
| 3. Trade channels | |||
| 4. Purchaser care | |||
| 5. Fame |
Marine radar for commercial vessels vs. household lanterns. The marks favor the examiner, but three factors favor you.
951 F.2d 330 (Fed. Cir. 1991). A single DuPont factor may be dispositive. The court affirmed no confusion between FROOTEE ICE and FROOT LOOPS.
How the rule applies. The words are reversed, the cadence differs and the overall impressions differ. The dissimilarity of the marks is dispositive.
Our marks reverse the words too. Use with Factor 1, Step 7.
Avoid the common traps
Some arguments feel right and still can't work. Part 1 names them up front, so you don't spend your hours on a dead end.
If the cited registration says "clothing" with no limits, it covers all clothing, sold everywhere, to everyone. Saying you sell only online won't help unless your identification says so.
A distinctive word usually outweighs a design or a word you disclaimed. Compare whole marks, never single words.
If the cited mark is registered in standard characters, a different logo doesn't make the marks different.
"We used it first" or "they stopped using theirs" doesn't work here. Build on the marks, the goods and your evidence.
In a close case the examiner sides with the earlier mark, so bring concrete evidence, not only argument. Step 6 shows you how.
What's inside
Follow Part 2 from start to finish. Every other part is a tool you open when a step tells you to.
Understanding your refusalThe 13 DuPont factors in plain English, your deadline, five rules
p. 2The 10-step response workflowEach step with its worksheet and its "Done when"
p. 6Legal standards by factorPaste-ready standards built on binding court decisions
p. 13Examiner arguments and counters60 arguments examiners make, each with its answer and authority
p. 22How to analyze50 authorities, each applied to an invented pair of marks
p. 27Your response templateThe fill-in response, evidence logs and optional AI prompts
p. 78Filing and what's nextTEAS step by step, a pre-filing checklist, every possible outcome
p. 83FAQsExtensions, multiple cited marks, AI, missed deadlines
p. 87TRACE™, your refusal diagnosticA data-driven read before you invest your time
p. 89PackagesIf you decide you'd rather have it drafted for you
p. 91Your time
Spread over two or three weeks, well inside a three-month deadline. Start the day you read your office action.
Calendar the deadline, download the documents, list every issue, check the quick exits.
Choose your factors and gather evidence. Step 6 takes the longest.
Pick your authorities and draft in the Word template.
Stress-test the draft, then file on TEAS and confirm on TSDR.
Not sure it's worth fighting?
Before you put in 8 to 15 hours, a TRACE Report plays devil's advocate. It argues the examiner's side, scores your refusal on nine factors and 180 benchmarks against 600+ decided Board cases, and tells you whether confusion is surmountable and which gaps to close. Then the workbook takes it from there.
The workbook points you here in Step 5 and Part 9. If you later choose a response package, the $25 is credited toward it.
Sample: PLAYES vs. PLAYERS, fictional marks. The Confusion Index is a proprietary Trademark Scrivener metric, not a USPTO standard. No outcome is guaranteed.
Get the workbook
Pay with PayPal or any card. After payment you come straight back here to download both files. Not legal advice.
Pay and downloadPay through PayPal in about a minute, then download the 106-page PDF and the Word template on the next screen.
Calendar your deadlineStep 1 and Worksheet 2.1 put your deadline, and a reminder two weeks before it, in your calendar.
Work the ten steps, then fileMost people need 8 to 15 hours over two or three weeks. You file on the USPTO's TEAS form, normally with no fee for a response.
Questions
Section 2(d) likelihood-of-confusion refusals, where the examining attorney says your mark is too close to a registered mark or an earlier application. It does not cover other refusal grounds.
The 106-page workbook as a PDF and the editable Word response template. You pay through PayPal and download both on the page you land on right after payment.
No. It's written for applicants without a lawyer. Each step tells you what to fill in and what "done" looks like.
Most people need 8 to 15 hours, spread over two or three weeks. Gathering evidence (Step 6) takes the longest, so start the day you read your office action.
If you're U.S.-domiciled, yes: you file through the USPTO's online response form. Foreign-domiciled applicants must be represented by a U.S. attorney.
No one can promise that. The examining attorney makes the decision. The workbook shows you how to build the strongest response your facts support.
Get a TRACE™ Report for $25 for our read on your refusal, or have Scrivener draft the response with a flat-fee or success-based package.
There is normally no USPTO fee to file a response. Fees for things like an extension are separate and paid by you directly to the USPTO.
No. Scrivener is an independent trademark administrator, not a law firm, and the workbook does not create an attorney-client relationship. It teaches a method; you write, approve and sign every word you file.
No. Every example mark, applicant and serial number is invented and labeled that way. The authorities they illustrate are real: 23 binding court decisions and 27 Board decisions, with pin cites supplied.
Email info@trademarkscrivener.com with your PayPal receipt and we'll send both files again.
Your deadline is already running
Ten steps, one worksheet at a time, and a template that's already formatted.
What happens next
Instant download · PDF + Word · Not legal advice